|
The choice of which sleep system to choose was tricky - on the one hand the first 6 days would be walking and camping at low level (actually at Sea Level on the first night), in the first week of September the nights could be fairly warm. But on the other hand, later in the fortnight I knew I'd be camping high in the mountains and as September drew on things could get a bit chilly.
In the end the flexible combination worked very well.
On the first night I slept in the Reactor Liner only, this was ideal and I believe the claim of +5C on a sleeping bag as it was warm enough.
Most nights I slept in the Reactor plus Quantum 250 combination. Again this was warm enough but had the additional flexibility that allowed me to have the sleeping bag upto my chest with the Reactor liner keeping the draughts around my shoulders at bay.
When camping above 2000m I also wore the Crux Halo Top. This is an extremely light down top which has a superb warmth to weight ratio. It effectively uprates the bag and is also worn as a warm layer around camp.
As for the POE Ether Thermo 6, I can't praise it enough! A superbly comfortable mat and very tough. On one occasion I was forced to camp on very rough ground and it smoothed out the bumps effortlessly - I was amazed.
I am sure its thermal characteristics also contributed to a good, warm nights sleep. This started me thinking - which is better: Neo Air or Ether Thermo 6?
Ether Thermo 6 is heavier but its more thermally efficient. Compared to a full length Neo Air I think I'd prefer it - especially given the price difference.
However a torso length Neo Air is only 260g and it packs down to nothing. Conclusion? For me I'd take the short Neo Air for trips of a couple of days and for longer trips I'll take the Ether Thermo 6.
|